Pricing and Payment Strategies for Cancer Drugs: Maximizing Patients' Access to Beneficial Therapies
Meeting Information: March 27, 2017 | 8:30 a.m. - 4:45 p.m. | Philadelphia, PA 19103
New therapies emerging on the cancer landscape, including targeted drugs, immunotherapies, and combinations of drugs, offer patients potential for improved outcomes, but often at a steep cost. For many cancer drugs that have long been on the market, sharp price increases and drug shortages threaten patients' access to needed therapies. Clinicians, patients, families, and healthcare systems increasingly must consider the financial risks associated with treatment options in addition to clinical benefits and risks. Solutions that ensure patients’ access to beneficial and affordable therapies require an evaluation of the drug pricing and payment landscape and the associated policies, practices, and market forces that shape strategies. An improved understanding of these processes could enable informed comparisons between treatment options based on efficacy, side effects, quality of life, and cost to patients.
In this third workshop in a series on cancer drug access and value, the President’s Cancer Panel will convene leaders and stakeholders across multiple sectors to identify key actions to support drug pricing and payment strategies that ensure patients’ access to high-value cancer therapies. Questions to be considered include the following:
- How can the value of a cancer therapy be determined?
- What factors affect pricing and payment practices for cancer drugs, and how do payers determine which drugs are covered?
- Are there approaches that could support transparency in cancer drug pricing and payment?
- What are the barriers to developing alternatives ways of pricing and paying for cancer drugs and how can these barriers be overcome?
- How could effective communication between clinicians (defined broadly) and patients be supported regarding treatment efficacy, benefits, harms, and costs?
Presentations and moderated discussions among participants will inform the Panel’s recommendations in a formal report to the President of the United States after the conclusion of series workshops.
Meetings of the President’s Cancer Panel are open to the public.
Agenda
Time | Agenda Item |
---|---|
8:00 a.m. | Registration |
8:30 a.m. | Welcome and Introductions |
9:10 a.m |
Session 1: Pricing and Payment Landscapes—Framing the Value of Cancer Drugs Opening Presentations
Discussion |
10:30 a.m. | Break |
10:45 a.m. | Session 2: Generating Recommendations—Overview |
10:50 a.m. | Session 3: Recommendations—Price |
12:10 p.m. | Public Comment |
12:20 p.m. | Lunch |
12:45 p.m. | Brainstorm—Beyond Clinical Care: Market, Policy, Health System, and Regulatory Effects on Cancer Drug Access and Cost |
1:30 p.m. | Session 4: Recommendations—Access to Treatments |
2:45 p.m. | Break |
3:00 p.m. | Session 5: Recommendations—Communicating Treatment Benefits |
4:15 p.m. | Public Comment |
4:25 p.m. | Closing Remarks |
4:45 p.m. | Adjourn |
Participants
Name | Title & Affiliations |
---|---|
Erin Aakhus, MD |
Fellow |
Anthony Barrueta, JD |
Senior Vice President |
Carmella Bocchino, RN |
Senior Advisor |
Randy Burkholder |
Vice President |
Deanna Darlington | Government Affairs Director Amgen, Inc. |
Stacie B. Dusetzina, PhD |
Assistant Professor |
Levi Garraway, MD |
Senior Vice President |
Ann M. Geiger, PhD |
Deputy Associate Director |
Hadiyah-Nicole Green, PhD |
Founder |
Clifford Hudis, MD, FACP | Chief Executive Officer American Society of Clinical Oncology @CliffordHudis |
Scott Josephs, MD | Vice President and National Medical Officer Medical Management – Clinical Performance and Quality Cigna @Cigna |
David Lansky, PhD |
President |
Kim Marschhauser, PhD |
Program Officer |
Lee Newcomer, MD |
Senior Vice President, Oncology |
Caroline F. Pearson |
Senior Vice President |
Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH |
Assistant Professor |
Scott D. Ramsey, MD, PhD |
Director |
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH |
Chair |
Abby B. Sandler, PhD |
Executive Secretary |
Ameet Sarpatwari, JD, PhD |
Assistant Director |
Andrew J. Schorr, MS |
President and Co-Founder |
Greg Simon, JD |
Director |
Josephine A. Sollano, PhD, MPH |
Global Vice President |
Owen Witte, MD | Member President’s Cancer Panel University Professor University of California Director Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research University of California, Los Angeles |
Yousuf Zafar, MD | Associate Professor of Medicine and Public Policy Duke University School of Medicine Director Center for Applied Cancer Health Policy Duke Cancer Institute |
Summary
Emerging cancer therapies—including targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination therapies—are creating opportunities for more effective, potentially curative, treatments. However, these drugs often come at substantial cost, contributing to patients’ financial toxicity and straining system-wide healthcare resources. The President’s Cancer Panel is focusing on these issues in its 2016-2017 series of meetings, Ensuring Patients’ Access to High-Value Cancer Drugs.
The third and final workshop in the Panel series—held on March 27, 2017, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania—convened experts in drug pricing and payment from the biopharmaceutical industry, insurance companies, healthcare organizations, and professional oncology organizations, along with patients and patient advocates, health economists, and other academic researchers. Participants reviewed key factors that affect pricing of and payment for cancer drug therapies, discussed what constitutes value in the context of cancer treatment, and proposed potential recommendations to maximize patients’ access to high-value cancer drugs while continuing to promote innovation in cancer drug development.
In the United States, drugs are purchased not by users and beneficiaries—namely, patients—but by third-party payers that often have limited leverage in price negotiations. Medicare is legislatively mandated to pay for all cancer drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and many states require private payers to cover the costs of all or most cancer drugs. Further, patients often do not have all the information they need to make informed decisions about treatment.
Workshop participants discussed potential strategies for increasing patients’ access to high-value cancer drugs. Competition would increase and prices may decrease if generic drugs and biosimilars were brought to market more quickly. Some participants supported revisiting coverage mandates to make it easier for payers to negotiate prices, or, in some cases, withhold coverage based on a drug’s value (as occurs in some other countries, e.g., England). Benefit plans and payment models could be structured to promote utilization of high-value treatments (e.g., eliminate copays for highly effective drugs, increase copays for less effective drugs, reduce physician incentives to prescribe expensive drugs when less costly/similarly efficacious alternatives are available). Participants acknowledged the many challenges in defining value. The many stakeholders in this area—patients, physicians, payers, pharmaceutical companies—have different, and sometimes competing, priorities. Convening these stakeholders and encouraging open dialogue could assist in developing a shared framework for assessing value. Safe harbor policies that allow pharmaceutical companies and payers to discuss value and price during drug development also may be beneficial.
Participants agreed that strategies must be developed to reduce the burden of drug costs for patients. For example, caps on out-of-pocket expenses and other benefit designs that protect patients could be considered. Clear communication between patients and physicians about treatment goals and the expected outcomes of various treatment options is critical. These interactions could be facilitated by decision support tools that include information about costs in addition to treatment efficacy and side effects. Patients and physicians need access to more information about costs and potential clinical outcomes to enable informed decision making; payers—including Medicare—are potential sources for real-world data on patient outcomes.
The President’s Cancer Panel will consider input and proposed recommendations from this workshop and previous workshops in this series. The Panel’s recommendations for ensuring patients’ access to high-value cancer drugs will be presented in its 2017 Report to the President of the United States.
A detailed meeting summary can be accessed here.